Archive for the ‘Taxes’ Category

January 2011 – Largest Tax Hikes in America’s History

Monday, August 9th, 2010

In just less than six months from now, on January 1, 2011, the largest tax hikes in the history of America will take effect. They will hit families and small businesses in three great waves.

On January 1, 2011, here’s what happens:

First Wave:

Expiration of 2001 and 2003 Tax Relief

In 2001 and 2003, the GOP Congress enacted several tax cuts for investors, small business owners, and families.

These will all expire on January 1, 2011.

Personal income tax rates will rise.

The top income tax rate will rise from 35 to 39.6 percent (this is also the rate at which two-thirds of small business profits are taxed).

The lowest rate will rise from 10 to 15 percent.

All the rates in between will also rise.
Itemized deductions and personal exemptions will again phase out, which has the same mathematical effect as higher marginal tax rates.
The full list of marginal rate hikes is below:

* The 10% bracket rises to an expanded 15%
*
* The 25% bracket rises to 28%
*
* The 28% bracket rises to 31%
*
* The 33% bracket rises to 36%
*
* The 35% bracket rises to 39.6%

Higher taxes on marriage and family.

The “marriage penalty” (narrower tax brackets for married couples) will return from the first dollar of income.
The child tax credit will be cut in half from $1000 to $500 per child.
The standard deduction will no longer be doubled for married couples relative to the single level.
The dependent care and adoption tax credits will be cut.
The return of the Death Tax.

This year only, there is no death tax. (It’s a quirk!) For those dying on or after January 1, 2011, there is a 55 percent top death tax rate on estates over $1 million. A person leaving behind two homes, a business, a retirement account, could easily pass along a death tax bill to their loved ones. Think of the farmers who don’t make much money, but their land, which they purchased years ago with after-tax dollars, is now worth a lot of money. Their children will have to sell the farm, which may be their livelihood, just to pay the estate tax if they don’t have the cash sitting around to pay the tax. Think about your own family’s assets. Maybe your family owns real estate, or a business that doesn’t make much money, but the building and equipment are worth $1 million. Upon their death, you can inherit the $1 million business tax free, but if they own a home, stock, cash worth $500K on top of the $1 million business, then you will owe the government $275,000 cash! That’s 55% of the value of the assets over $1 million! Do you have that kind of cash sitting around waiting to pay the estate tax?

Higher tax rates on savers and investors.

The capital gains tax will rise from 15 percent this year to 20 percent in 2011.

The dividends tax will rise from 15 percent this year to 39.6 percent in 2011.

These rates will rise another 3.8 percent in 2013.

Second Wave:

Obamacare
There are over twenty new or higher taxes in Obamacare. Several will first go into effect on January 1, 2011. They include:

The “Medicine Cabinet Tax”

Thanks to Obamacare, Americans will no longer be able to use health savings account (HSA), flexible spending account (FSA), or health reimbursement (HRA) pre-tax dollars to purchase non-prescription, over-the-counter medicines (except insulin).
The “Special Needs Kids Tax”

This provision of Obamacare imposes a cap on flexible spending accounts (FSAs) of $2500 (Currently, there is no federal government limit). There is one group of FSA owners for whom this new cap will be particularly cruel and onerous: parents of special needs children.

There are thousands of families with special needs children in the United States, and many of them use FSAs to pay for special needs education.

Tuition rates at one leading school that teaches special needs children in Washington , D.C. ( National Child Research Center ) can easily exceed $14,000 per year.

Under tax rules, FSA dollars can not be used to pay for this type of special needs education.

The HSA (Health Savings Account) Withdrawal Tax Hike.

This provision of Obamacare increases the additional tax on non-medical early withdrawals from an HSA from 10 to 20 percent, disadvantaging them relative to IRAs and other tax-advantaged accounts, which remain at 10 percent.


 

Third Wave:

The Alternative Minimum Tax (AMT) and Employer Tax Hikes

When Americans prepare to file their tax returns in January of 2011, they’ll be in for a nasty surprise-the AMT won’t be held harmless, and many tax relief provisions will have expired.

The major items include:

The AMT will ensnare over 28 million families, up from 4 million last year.

According to the left-leaning Tax Policy Center, Congress’ failure to index the AMT will lead to an explosion of AMT taxpaying families-rising from 4 million last year to 28.5 million. These families will have to calculate their tax burdens twice, and pay taxes at the higher level. The AMT was created in 1969 to ensnare a handful of taxpayers.

Small business expensing will be slashed and 50% expensing will disappear.

Small businesses can normally expense (rather than slowly-deduct, or “depreciate”) equipment purchases up to $250,000.

This will be cut all the way down to $25,000. Larger businesses can currently expense half of their purchases of equipment.

In January of 2011, all of it will have to be “depreciated.”
Taxes will be raised on all types of businesses.

There are literally scores of tax hikes on business that will take place. The biggest is the loss of the “research and experimentation tax credit,” but there are many, many others. Combining high marginal tax rates with the loss of this tax relief will cost jobs.
Tax Benefits for Education and Teaching Reduced.

The deduction for tuition and fees will not be available.

Tax credits for education will be limited.

Teachers will no longer be able to deduct classroom expenses.

Coverdell Education Savings Accounts will be cut.

Employer-provided educational assistance is curtailed.

The student loan interest deduction will be disallowed for hundreds of thousands of families.
Charitable Contributions from IRAs no longer allowed.

Under current law, a retired person with an IRA can contribute up to $100,000 per year directly to a charity from their IRA.

This contribution also counts toward an annual “required minimum distribution.” This ability will no longer be there.

PDF Version Read more: http://www.atr.org/six-months-untilbr-largest-tax-hikes-a5171##ixzz0sY8waPq1

And worse yet?

Now, your insurance will be INCOME on your W2’s!

One of the surprises we’ll find come next year, is what follows – – a little “surprise” that 99% of us had no idea was included in the “new and improved” healthcare legislation . . . the dupes, er, dopes, who backed this administration will be astonished!

Starting in 2011, (next year folks), your W-2 tax form sent by your employer will be increased to show the value of whatever health insurance you are given by the company. It does not matter if that’s a private concern or governmental body of some sort.

If you’re retired? So what… your gross will go up by the amount of insurance you get.

You will be required to pay taxes on a large sum of money that you have never seen. Take your tax form you just finished and see what $15,000 or $20,000 additional gross does to your tax debt. That’s what you’ll pay next year.

For many, it also puts you into a new higher bracket so it’s even worse.

This is how the government is going to buy insurance for the15% that don’t have insurance and it’s only part of the tax increases.

Not believing this??? Here is a research of the summaries…..

On page 25 of 29: TITLE IX REVENUE PROVISIONS- SUBTITLE A: REVENUE OFFSET PROVISIONS-(sec. 9001, as modified by sec. 10901) Sec.9002 “requires employers to include in the W-2 form of each employee the aggregate cost of applicable employer sponsored group health coverage that is excludable from the employees gross income.”

– Joan Pryde is the senior tax editor for the Kiplinger letters. – Go to Kiplingers and read about 13 tax changes that could affect you. Number 3 is what is above.

Follow by Example?

Friday, June 12th, 2009

My husband and I have decided to follow the President’s example and sacrifice along with him.Biting the bullet on expenses, the President ordered the cabinet to cut a whopping $100 million from the $3.5 trillion federal budget!

We’re so impressed by this sacrifice that my husband and I have decided to do the same thing with our personal budget.  We spend about $2000 a month on our house payment, groceries, clothing, bills, etc for our family. But now, it’s time to roll up our sleeves, get out the budget cutting ax and go line by line through our total expenses, and start chopping away.

We’re going to cut our monthly spending at exactly the same ratio (1/35,000) as that of our leaders in Washington. After doing the math, it looks like instead of spending $2000 a month; we’re going to have to cut that number by six cents!  Yes, we’re going to have to somehow get by with only $1999.94, but let’s face it, that’s what sacrifice is all about. We’ll just have to learn to do more with less – We’ll have to simply learn to do without some things, that are, frankly, luxuries. 

What a country!

THE ANTI-SUCCESS PRESIDENCY

Thursday, April 16th, 2009

THE ANTI-SUCCESS PRESIDENCY

By DICK MORRIS & EILEEN MCGANN

Published on DickMorris.com on April 15, 2009

Sit in on a corporate board room struggling to come to grips with the new economic climate Obama has created.  Do we expand?  Create more jobs? Launch a new product line? Step up our marketing efforts?  Ratchet up production?
   
But, wait a minute.  The bigger our company gets, the closer we come to being “too big to fail,” a “systemic risk.”  The nearer we are to intrusive government oversight, limits on executive pay, and regulators breathing down our necks. We better watch out.  We may even get taken over. Stay small.  Forget the new jobs.
   
An investor ponders where to put his 401 (k) retirement money.  Should he invest in robust, growing companies?  Firms with a bright future?  But, be careful, they could get so big that they get taken over by the government and you lose your entire investment.  Don’t invest in firms that will fail, but stay away from those that will succeed too.
         
Meanwhile, at the kitchen table, a middle class family discusses their career moves.  Should she go back to school to pursue a better job at higher pay?  Should he put in overtime?  Move up in the company? 
   
Hey wait a minute.  Our combined income is just under $200,000 a year.  If we go any higher, our tax bracket goes up, we start having Social Security withheld on our new income, we lose our current deductions for our mortgage, and state and local taxes, and charitable donations.
   
Forget the promotion.  Forget the new job.
   
Downtown, investors in a hedge fund are meeting to consider participating in the bank bailout scheme by buying toxic assets from failing institutions.  We could make a killing.  The investments could pan out big time.  It’s a risk, but the reward could be great.
   
But hold on a second.  If we make tens of millions, hundreds of millions, while taxpayers have to pay for failed banks, won’t we get hit with a 90 percent tax?  Won’t we get to see our pictures on the front page with the president shaking an angry finger in our faces?  Yes, now he wants us to invest, to help him rescue the banks, but once we do, won’t he be on our case like he was on AIG’s?
   
The Japanese have a saying that, thankfully, has no English equivalent: The highest nail gets hammered down first.  Obama’s perverse view of fairness threatens to create reverse incentives, militating against growth, jobs, expansion, and upward mobility.
    
For decades, astute observers of national welfare policy warned of the perversity of the incentives which kept the poor on welfare and discouraged them from taking jobs.  Employment meant that their slightly higher income would be more than offset by the loss of other benefits like food stamps, day care, rent supplements, and Medicaid.  Work didn’t pay.
    
Now Obama is applying the same crazy policies to the upper end of the economic spectrum.
   
Upward mobility is alive and well in the United States, at least until Obama took over.  A study conducted in the late 1990s examined the economic fate of those consigned to the bottom 20% of incomes in 1980.  The analysis concluded that more than four out of five had left the bottom quintile and one in five was now in the top 20%!  It is true that the top quintile is getting richer while the bottom is getting poorer, but the bottom is not the same people.  There is, fortunately, a constant churning at the bottom as new immigrants move in and those who used to be on the bottom begin their long, thrilling, upward climb to the American dream.
    
But Obama does not believe in individual upward mobility.  He would penalize it, tax it, regulate it, inveigh against it, and disincentivize it.   We will be like salmon swimming upstream to mate.  We will overcome the currents, the waterfall, the rocks, the predators and will grapple our way up the stream.  Then, at the top of the waterfall, will stand Obama the Bear, waiting to scoop us up and have us for dinner.  The taxman cometh.

Go to DickMorris.com to read all of Dick’s columns!

__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

PLEASE FORWARD THIS E-MAIL TO FRIENDS AND FAMILY AND TELL THEM THEY CAN GET THESE COLUMNS E-MAILED TO THEM FOR FREE BY SUBSCRIBING AT
WWW.DICKMORRIS.COM!

THANK YOU!

***COPYRIGHT EILEEN MCGANN AND DICK MORRIS 2009.  REPRINTS WITH PERMISSION ONLY***

Why doesn’t Rahm Emanuel pay property taxes?

Wednesday, March 4th, 2009

Compiled from various news, wire and internet sources, including USA Today:

 According to the Cook County Assessor’s website, the Chicago home of four-term Democrat Congressman and new White House Chief of Staff, Rahm Emanuel, doesn’t exist.  While the address of 4228 North Hermitage is listed as Emanuel’s residence on the Illinois State Board of Elections’ website, there seems to be no public record of Emanuel ever paying property taxes on this home.

The Cook County Assessor’s and Cook County Treasurer’s online records indicate Emanuel’s Chicago neighbors pay between $3,500 and $7,000 annually.   However, Illinois Review has been unable to locate any evidence that the former Clinton advisor and investment banker is paying his fair share of Cook County’s notoriously high tax burden.

Why wouldn’t 4228 North Hermitage property owners Rahm Emanuel and wife Amy Rule pay property taxes?

One reason may be because Emanuel and Rule declared their 4228 North Hermitage home as the office location for their personal non-profit foundation called the “Rahm Emanuel and Amy Rule Charitable Foundation”. As the non-profit’s headquarters, their home could be exempt from paying property taxes.

In January 2007, USA Today reported on Emanuel’s foundation:

The Rahm Emanuel and Amy Rule Charitable Trust was formed in 2002, when the Chicago lawmaker was first elected. The former Clinton White House aide and his wife, Amy Rule, are its only donors. Emanuel was an investment banker after serving in the White House.

The trust reported having $2,900 on hand at the end of 2005 after receiving $34,000 from Emanuel and donating more than $31,000 During the past three years, Emanuel’s charity gave nearly $25,000 to the Anshe Emet synagogue and school [a private school that the Rahm/Rule children attend]…, and $15,000 to the foundation run by former president Bill Clinton. It also gave $14,000 to Marwen, a Chicago charity that provides art classes and other educational help to low-income children. Rule is on Marwen’s board.

So Rahm Emanuel and Amy Rule do not pay any property taxes and they get income tax write-offs by donating $25,000 to the Synagogue and other amounts of money to their Foundation?? 

Think about it … Doesn’t this allow their kids to attend school tuition-free by allowing them to write off personal expenses??

Holy Hypocrite Batman!!!  What a racket!

Take all your income and donate it back to yourself via tax exempt orgs. where you can spend it on things such as expenses to operate your car, pay the electric and water bills, etc.

(Apparently if you are a hypocritical “liberal” democrat who advocates raising taxes on everyone else, this is all permissible.)

Emanuel’s 4228 North Hermitage home is one of the largest in the neighborhood, with a side yard that appears to be a vacant lot, making the Emanuels’ property the largest portion on the block.

Other North Hermitage homes on Emanuel’s block are valued in the $500,000 plus range. According to Cook County Treasurer’s website, the Chicago owners of nearby 118 year old 4222 North Hermitage pay almost $6800 annually. The family at 4224 North Heritage pays $6000 each year in property taxes.

President  Obama – himself a connected, Chicago insider, who has benefited from questionable land deals – may find it difficult to explain why his very own Chicago-based chief of staff doesn’t pay property taxes like the “little guy” he claims to represent.  Or perhaps allowing his wealthy friends to avoid taxes is part of Obama’s trickle down redistribution economics. It’s certainly the kind of “change” that 52% of Americans can understand, right?  ...  Illinoisans are quite familiar with such in federal indictment land of Daley, Blagojevich, Madigan, Jones, Cellini, Rezko, …….and maybe, soon ….. Burris.

The Tax Poem

Wednesday, December 31st, 2008

At first, I thought this was funny…

Tax his land, Tax his bed,

Tax the table, At which he’s fed.

Tax his tractor, Tax his mule,

Teach him taxes, Are the rule.

Tax his work, Tax his pay,

He works for peanuts, Anyway!

Tax his cow, Tax his goat,

Tax his pants, Tax his coat.

Tax his ties, Tax his shirt,

Tax his work, Tax his dirt.

Tax his tobacco, Tax his drink,

Tax him if he tries to think.

Tax his cigars, Tax his beers,

If he cries, Tax his tears.

Tax his car, Tax his gas,

Find other ways To tax his ass.

Tax all he has Then let him know

That you won’t be done Till he has no dough.

When he screams and hollers, Tax him some more,

Tax him ’til He’s good and sore.

Then tax his coffin, Tax his grave,

Tax the sod in which he’s laid.

Put these words upon his tomb, ‘Taxes drove me to my doom…’

When he’s gone, do not relax, Its time to apply the inheritance tax.

Think about this:

Accounts Receivable Tax Building Permit Tax – CDL license Tax – Cigarette Tax Corporate Income Tax – Dog License Tax – Excise Taxes Federal Income Tax – Federal Unemployment Tax (FUTA) Fishing License Tax – Food License Tax – Fuel Permit Tax Gasoline Tax (44.75 cents per gallon) – FUTA Tax – Gross Receipts Tax Hunting License Tax – Inheritance Tax – Intangible Tax – Inventory Tax IRS Interest Charges IRS Penalties (tax on top of tax) Liquor Tax – Luxury Taxes – Marriage License Tax Tax Medicare Tax – Occupational Tax – Personal Property Tax – Property Tax Real Estate Tax – Service Charge Tax – Social Security Tax Road Usage Tax – Sales Tax – Recreation Tax – Recreational Vehicle Tax School Tax – State Income Tax – State Unemployment Tax – SUTA Tax – Telephone Federal Excise Tax Telephone Federal Universal Service Fee  Telephone Federal, State and Local Surcharge Taxes Telephone Minimum Usage Surcharge Tax Telephone Recurring and Non- recurring Charges Tax Telephone State and Local Tax Telephone Usage Charge Tax – Utility Taxes Vehicle License Registration Tax – Vehicle Sales Tax Watercraft Registration Tax – Well Permit Tax – Workers Compensation Tax

Not one of these taxes existed 100 years ago, and our nation was the most prosperous on the planet. We had no national debt, had the largest middleclass in the world, and Mom stayed home to raise the kids.