Posts Tagged ‘self defense’

“Personal Boundaries: Where Do You Draw the Line?”

Tuesday, July 28th, 2009

“Personal Boundaries: Where Do You Draw the Line?”

by Kathy Jackson

The last few weeks we have been republishing some articles from past issues
of Concealed Carry Magazine to give everyone a taste of what they are
missing if they aren’t a subscriber to the United States Concealed Carry
Association. This week’s article is from the Web Only Articles. We have way
too much great info to squeeze into the issues of Concealed Carry Magazine,
so we publish the additional articles on the web. New articles are added
every week.

Listed below are some conditions under which I intend to fight back even if
I don’t think I can win.

I have made this list for myself because I understand that the natural thing
to do, when something bad happens, is to deny that it is happening: “This
can’t be happening to me!”

Even if you get past that thought (a lot of victims never do), the other
natural tendency is to tell yourself that if you wait, if you do what the
other person says, things will get better. The situation will work itself
out. All you have to do is cooperate. The attacker will take your wallet,
your car keys, whatever, and leave you alone. Just wait, do what he says,
and everything will be okay. That’s what most people who are attacked tell
themselves — and in most cases, that is exactly what people should do. Even
if you are armed, why kill someone if you don’t have to? It’s only stuff!

But while waiting for an opening and cooperating with the attacker might be
the best survival strategy in many situations, there are a few very specific
situations where waiting and cooperating are the worst things the victim can
possibly do.

A woman forced into a car by an attacker, for instance, has a 95% or higher
chance of getting killed if she complies. Even if it seems highly likely the
attacker will kill her right there if she doesn’t get in the car, the fact
is that right at that moment, the odds are the very best they will ever be
for her. They might be lousy odds, but they aren’t going to get any better.
So I have decided, in advance, that if I’m ever in that situation, that’s
when and where I will fight back no matter what my frozen brain and
in-denial guts are telling me about my odds.

Similarly, a man forced into a back room on his knees, with his back to the
attacker, has just been put into the execution position. Most of the time,
when someone is forced into this position, what comes next is a bullet in
the back of the skull. Once you are on your knees, you don’t have any more
choices left, even if do you suddenly realize what is about to happen. If
you’re going to save your own life in such a situation, you have to make the
choice to fight back before you’re on your knees.

The purpose of analyzing this stuff beforehand is to make sure that even my
frozen brain and my in-denial guts cannot lull me into cooperating if I am
ever in one of the extreme places where a victim really needs to fight if
she is going to survive. Because I’ve thought about this stuff in advance,
if something like it ever happens, even my frozen brain will have a definite
decision point.

Some of my personal boundaries are:

* I will not go anywhere at gunpoint. If the bad guy wants me to go
somewhere else, it’s because he will be able to do something to me there
that he is unwilling or unable to do to me right here, right now. Therefore
no matter how bad the tactical situation seems right here and now, right
here and now is the absolute best chance to fight back I will ever have and
I intend to use it.

* I will not be tied up. If the bad guy wants to tie me up, it is because he
wants to do things to me that I would be able to prevent if I were not tied
up. Therefore, I will resist while I am still able to do so.

* I will not kneel. No one is going to execute me. If I die, I’ll die
fighting.

* If someone tries to take one of my children, I will fight even at the risk
of my child being killed in the resultant firefight. I plan this not because
I have positive assurance that I would be successful, but because I would
not be able to live with myself if I simply “allowed” my child to be taken,
brutalized, and his body perhaps never found. I’d rather watch him die in
front of me. (Yes, that’s harsh … but given those two options and only
those two, which would you choose?)

My point is not that your boundaries should be the same as mine. It is
simply that even though you can wait until the very last moment to make the
final decision about fighting back, you should have certain things already
set into your decision-making machinery beforehand. If you don’t, and if you
are ever attacked, you may not have enough time to do anything but stand
there with your brain frozen solid while your attacker takes all your
choices away.
***

Kathy Jackson is the Managing Editor of Concealed Carry Magazine.